November/December 2007

Financial Aid Leads to Economic Security

chartWe’re all aware by now of the economic value of education. The more you get, the better off you’ll be economically. While it can be a little more complicated than that, educational credentials and job skills are the surest route to economic security.

Recent Census Bureau data clearly illustrate this point, as shown in Table 1. It’s not surprising that higher education levels also correspond with significantly lower levels of poverty, as the bold numbers on the bars indicate.

Another important fact is that the earnings premium on increased educational attainment is growing. This trend should not surprise us either. The increased earnings premium is merely a reflection of our changing economy. Today’s jobs that offer decent wages (as well as health and retirement benefits) require higher credentials and skill levels.

These new job market demands are impacting millions of low-skilled Wisconsinites. In 2006, for example, over 1.7 million adults in the state possessed only a high school education or less. The solution for them and their families, as well as for the increasing numbers of employers crying out for better-skilled employees, is greater access to postsecondary education and training opportunities.

Many adults do not have the disposable income or savings, however, to spend on tuition and other costs of education, despite how important that education may be for them in the long run. Financial aid for this large population of adults, many of them balancing their schooling with work and family obligations, is a critical piece in the state’s workforce puzzle, and a key to the economic prosperity of Wisconsin’s families.

Unfortunately, despite increases in recent budgets, our public investments in financial aid have not kept pace with the costs of postsecondary programs. The result is that at a time of increasing demand, those services are being priced out of range for many low- and middle-income Wisconsinites. For example, while the cost of attending the University of Wisconsin rose 55 percent over the last ten years, the amount of need-based financial aid grew only 24 percent during that time. The result is a large group of low-skilled adults that need postsecondary skills and credentials (whether in the form of certificates of training, technical diplomas, associates or bachelors degrees) but are not able to afford our universities and technical colleges.

Issues surrounding postsecondary education and financial aid have garnered significant attention in recent months. Numerous reports and newspaper articles have touched on one aspect or another of the problem along with potential solutions. Business leaders have been at the forefront of this emerging conversation, urging greater investments and offering fresh ideas, from “Human TIFs” to greater employer involvement. Organizations such as Competitive Wisconsin have called for increased financial aid investments as a way to spur economic and wage growth. And the Governor has successfully advanced the Wisconsin Covenant, a promise of access to postsecondary education for qualifying students.

A comprehensive discussion of our financial aid investments and their impact, as well as student needs and enrollment behavior should occur to ensure strategic and efficient use of our financial aid dollars.

We offer the following thoughts on what that discussion could entail:

  • The design of our financial aid tools should be examined. Our financial aid tools have served traditional students well, but do not appear to fit the needs and enrollment behavior of a growing number of working adults. For example, many working adults may not qualify for aid given the current income limits or the “at least half time” requirement within the Wisconsin Higher Education Grant program. These and other specific design changes should be considered as ways to help our financial aid tools better serve the changing student population.
  • Investments require capital. While new ideas should be explored for ways to invest in our human capital, there are no shortcuts to meeting the workforce demands of our employers and to raising wages. Overall funding increases will be needed to move more students into and through postsecondary programs.
  • Existing financial aid programs should be utilized to ensure efficiency. While creating entirely new financial aid tools may grab more headlines and attract more attention, it is often more cost-effective to enhance existing systems and programs.
  • Financial aid should follow the student, not the institution. Students are increasingly mobile between institutions, for example moving between technical colleges and UW campuses. Policymakers should keep that in mind so any potential reforms do not create artificial barriers to program completion.
  • Loans already account for a growing share of financial aid. Though loans are a legitimate piece of the financial aid puzzle, the trend toward greater student debt loads should be taken into account, and discussions should focus on other ways to ensure greater access to and completion of postsecondary programs.
  • Offer incentives based on priorities of the state. Incentives could be used to encourage more students to remain in the state after graduation. Also, aid could be focused to some extent on emerging, high-demand industries and sectors. This could position Wisconsin at the forefront of key industries and trends, instead of trying to compete later with other states and nations for the appropriately-skilled labor.
  • Keep in mind that mid-skill levels are most in demand. Most of the jobs being created today, and of the jobs expected to be created in coming years, are in the “mid-skill level” range, typically requiring one to two years of postsecondary study. Financial aid tools need to be designed with this in mind, and not focused exclusively on only the highest-end jobs and credentials.

Keeping these ideas in mind could lead to greater and better-designed financial aid investments for our students and for our employers, and could lead to increased economic security for our families.